Crucifixion

This blog deals with the meaning of Joshua's Crucifixion. Before that, some feedback from recent blogs. Finally, upcoming watch dates and a long war headline review.

Ishmael's Heirs

In recent blogs I have been exploring the general issue of finding another set of 12 tribes. These would be a set of countries that ultimately spring from Ishmael.

Theoretically, there should be another set of 12 nations that descend from Ishmael. At the same time, they should be prophetically picking up echos of Jacob's blessings over his own sons given at the end of Genesis. This would be like Jacob's heirs in Europe. Conceptually, the text is applying to all nations around the earth even though the text was written by heirs of Jacob.

I would expect Ishmael's tribes to follow the same Revelation 12 seal dates. I would also expect them to have national characteristics that can be tied back into the text.

My starting point for this is the Islamic world. The Revelation passages that appear to be starting up now in Iran mention the tribes from around the Euphrates, and call out the singular "unsealed" tribe, which would be Israel. These modern nations are obviously Islamic, so there is a religious tie in Ishmael's side like there is with Christianity in the Roman world. Those nations are also "sealed" so landing under the same set of seal dates as we already know in Europe.

Hagarism

It turns out there is a standard historical name for some of this. The term became the name of a book published in 1977. The book is no longer in print, most likely because it offended religious, probably Zionist, interests. In any case, the link here is to a Wikipedia article that summaries the book and introduces the historical use of the term "Hagarism".

Hagar, of course, is the mother of Ishmael. Before there was Islam, the general family of religions in that part of the world were identified in ancient writing by this term. So the religion of the heirs of Hagar, so the people who had some level of faith inherited from Ishmael and the promises to Abraham through Ishmael.

I do not believe a strict historical study would be the path to finding these specific tribes, but it does suggest we are on the right path. Thanks for the feedback on this interesting point.

Afghanistan

Ryan has been adding a few printed references to his collection of unusual Bibles. This so he has documented evidence where the text has been disputed in history. These disputes will probably show up in the audit work too.

This week he added a printed English translation of the Samaritan Pentateuch. It also has an English translation from Hebrew Pentateuch. These 2 texts are printed together side-by-side on the printed page. There is also special highlighting and extensive footnotes. That reference work is in English, but marks the differences in these 2 different ancient canons.

For our recovery work, this is important as it flags disputable points throughout the first 5 books of the Bible.

Remember, the Samaritans were the northern tribes. Joseph ruled the north, and was given Shechem by Jacob. This is known history to the modern Samaritans who keep this ancient text. They are preserving memory of that group of people. This is part of the background for the story of the Woman at the Well.

In surveying this new reference work, Ryan has been looking at the footnotes. In addition to calling out Shechem as the place given by Jacob to Joseph, there are other important notes.

One important foot note hinted at a tradition that Ephraim, so son of Joseph, as a tribe, was taken to Afghanistan. The "Af" in that modern nation's name is the "Eph" in the ancient tribal name. Afghanistan translates as something like the "land of Ephraim."

We may have found Ishmael's Ephraim, by name. More work to confirm seal dates for that geography. In any case, an interesting note to this work.

Path To 70

There is another point to note on this tribal study. The Vine object carries the flowers that map pairs of letters. So there are 12 flowers on the front.

These are like the 12 tribes. There is also a flower at the top, an odd one out.

So the 2 leaves for each of those flowers is now 24 nations. Add the odd one out at the top, so a 25th tribe somewhere. (Maybe Dan. Maybe Iran.)

The vine then has 10 more flowers. They are behind the front and deal with 3d models that are alternate solutions to 3d design issues. These additional 3d objects provide the parts needed to complete the sower and reaper.

Because there are 5 such additional models, there are 10 more leaves. So the 25 nations now becomes 35 nations. Remember, 1 nation per leaf. So are we done when we find 35 nations?

The table of Nations after Noah calls out 70. To reach from 35 to 70 means we are missing yet another factor of 2. Another doubling. Presumably the basic 12 is folding out following the Silver set of 3d objects to reach 35 and then the Copper set, which doubles the letters, is the path to reaching a full set of 70 modern nations.

The United Nations currently has 193 members. Presumably this is a splintering beyond a divine design goal of 70 nations on earth.

In any case, it looks to be theoretically possible to identify all 70 nations and eventually match them back to the original table of nations. All but Jacob's Benjamin, so all but modern Israel should eventually be redeemed.

Nehemiah's Commissioning

The link here is to Nehemiah 1 in the BRB. This is the start of the story of Nehemiah going before king Artaxerxes in order to be given the commissioning to go and restore Jerusalem's walls.

I have discussed this as one of the stories that we would expect to see replayed again in our modern era. This would mean someone commissioned by modern Iran in order to have some part in rebuilding modern Jerusalem.

This is the last formal, intergovernmental, event in the historical story, so I would generally guess to see this replay last in the modern history of Israel. So 1974 + 70 years = 2044 is a date to at least entertain for this event. (There is still much timeline work to do, which might change or clarify this timing.)

So the feedback this week brought up the point that Nehemiah is the cup bearer to the king. That office, cup bearer, is also part of the prophetic story that distinguishes modern Egypt from modern Israel.

We should note that the cup bearer is pharaoh's official who is restored to his position. The baker, of course, was hanged like Haman.

As nations, this story from Joseph's day is telling us that modern Egypt is the part of Benjamin, so Ishmael's Benjamin, which is not lost like Jacob's Benjamin, so Israel.

Pairing to Nehemiah

So what happens when we combine both of these stories? We may be able to sketch out what we might expect in terms of the future history of Israel.

It suggests that someone from Egypt, or Egypt as a modern nation, the cup bearer, formally goes to Iran and gets permission from a leader there to carry out reconstruction of Jerusalem's walls. Idiomatically this could mean reconstruction of Jerusalem as an entire city.

In the future chronology of Jerusalem, this should follow someone who has previously received permission to rebuild something at ancient mount Moriah. (What religion rebuilds there is determined by the outcome of war with Iran.)

In any case, matching Nehemiah to modern Egypt is a reasonable hunch as to what we may eventually see unfolding at the end of this crazy time in world history. Thanks for this feedback.

Problem of Sacrifice

In early 2016 Ryan and I were hosting a series of online meetings where we were reviewing our work to that point. I was doing a series of audio live streams where I was going through parts of our project and status.

I was running late, and so was preparing in a hurry. While preparing one of those talks I stumbled on Acts 15 and how that chapter is calling out the editors. There was a riddle there, each editor has an identifying letter.

That discovery changed the course of our work because we could become much more formal in our understanding of the edits in the text. The BRB/TT pair of apps that Ryan updates nearly every week is still in that line of reasoning.

The link above is to Acts 15:19 in the BRB, which is where that chapter provides a list that identifies the earlier 5 editors. That chapter also provides the letter for Ananias, the 6th editor of the New Testament.

The keyword, given for Solomon, is "sacrifices." This is where Acts 15 calls out the sacrificial system of Solomon as being an addition to the text. Any text that suggests sacrifice is a good thing should be considered a Solomon era edit and practice.

This means the entire sacrificial system of Jerusalem is false. It is NOT an inspired idea. Solomon introduced the practice, edited the text, including insertions from Abraham's day down through Moses. Later editors would elaborate the false practice of sacrifice in various ways. We see it still today.

So What Happened On the Cross?

As a rule for identifying Solomon, this verse in Acts 15 is simple and easy to understand. Remember, they were writing about how to refute the men who come down from Jerusalem and interrupt the work of the Apostles.

But without sacrifice, what was the purpose of Joshua's death on the cross?

In Christianity we are taught this was to appease an angry god. It was atonement for sin, it paid a sin debt. As believers we now come under that blood atonement.

There has always been some level of contradiction in this story. Real debts can either be paid OR forgiven. They are not paid AND forgiven. But these details miss the bigger point. Acts 15 tells us to stay away from the concept of sacrifice as a way to understand Joshua. Sacrifice is NOT a concept that is part of a real community of faith.

Ryan and I have struggled with this problem since that time in 2016 when we first understood the problem of editors. There have been times when Ryan has tried to cut out most of the crucifixion story. Indeed, Islam still cuts it out completely.

But, what we learned from that experiment is the text is not whole without the account of what happened at the cross. So we are left with the problem of understanding that historical event without using sacrifice as the divine explanation.

We can moderate the problem some when we note that the Jews were conducting a human sacrifice. (The Epstein class still conducts human sacrifice.) So that was the Jewish purpose. They would write in that this was to appease an angry god. That part we understand.

But what, exactly, WAS the divine purpose for Joshua's death?

The Shepherd and His Flock

The link here is to John 10 in the BRB. This story gives a parable about sheep and a shepherd. Joshua is the shepherd. We are his sheep. In that parable he explains that he lays down is life for the sheep. This is a sign of being a good shepherd.

It helps to remember that Benjamin, so the Jews, are the wolf. See Genesis 49:27. This is the primary predator of sheep. They are our earthly enemy. That same wolf is mentioned in this same John passage, see John 10:12. John 10 is explaining how Joshua defends his sheep from the wolf. So Joshua defends the sheep by laying down his life. This parable is not particularly clear about why that is important. Especially if this is not an atoning sacrifice in the Solomon sense of sacrifice.

If Joshua's death is not a sacrifice in Solomon's sense, what purpose did it serve that Joshua should die on a cross? In a fashion that the Jews would know of, and edit in, as an atoning human sacrifice?

A related question, Why was it so important that the Jews, so the wolf, would need to hide, through editing, the true purpose of Joshua's death? Let me explain what was going on.

Gaining Authority

Laying down his own life is how Joshua gained authority over the wolf.

But how? What authority did Joshua gain by his death on the cross? How does this benefit his sheep especially if this is NOT an atoning sacrifice?

The first point to remember is that he was only dead for 3 days. By Sunday morning he had gained something that he could use later against the wolf.

The grave could not hold him because he was not guilty of anything. This is useful to understand, but not the root of what he gained. Killing Joshua could not leave him dead because of his life. He was proving that point too. But this is not what he had gained on resurrection morning.

The authority Joshua had gained by resurrection morning was that he now had authority over the wolf. He could now kill the wolf without himself being guilty of breaking the commandment against killing. He gained the right to exterminate the wolf from the face of earth using a little understood right of defense. Maybe we should say a right of revenge.

Notice carefully that the Iranians are only defending themselves against the Zionists. They are only firing back. The are NOT initiating. They are carefully keeping records. Thus labels on rockets posted on social media. They are using their right of revenge, their right to defend themselves. They call it the "eye for an eye principle." This is their idiom for what I am discussing here.

Note The Timing

In Joshua's own day that revenge came in 70 AD when the Roman army marched in and burned down the city of Jerusalem. Why was it 40 years later when Joshua used his new gained right over the wolf? Simple answer: He was waiting for the guilt to spread, to increase, beyond the leaders and immediate crowds that had called for his crucifixion.

So what is going on now in the world?

In the flow of human history we are now at Resurrection Sunday. For the past 200+ years we have been slowly replaying passion week. Over the past 200+ years the same Zionists who crucified Joshua 2000 years ago have now gained blood guilt from millions of people their vassal armies have killed.

Nearly every war has been caused by Zionists. They have consolidated their power over most of the earth. They are working to establish a world capital in Jerusalem. Their goal is nearly reached. Only a few countries still remain. Trump still needs to conquer Cuba, for example.

We are now to the point where the story of Zacchaeus matters. I touched on this recently, but let me dwell on the punch line.

Zacchaeus

The link here is to Luke 19 in the BRB. There are 2 stories in that chapter, they begin with a visit to Zacchaeus' house. Then it turns to a parable. The parable is about the unfaithful servant. So the wolf.

It ends with verses 26-27. "He said to them, I say to you, to everyone who has will be given, and from him who has not, even what he has will be taken away from him. However, those enemies of mine who did not want me to reign over them bring and kill before me."

The seals are what are given. They mark tribes. That seal is to be taken way. Jacob's Benjamin becomes Babylon.

Bringing his enemies before him is the ingathering we see in modern Israel starting especially in 1948. But it was not yet time. 1948 was the replay of Joshua being put into the tomb. It was a story from late in Passion Week. In the flow of human history, Joshua was not yet out of the tomb.

Now is the time when Joshua is out of the tomb. We are in the prophetic window of Resurrection Sunday. We still have another few YEARS, so it is not finished this year, but we are watching it happen now.

This is why, in Zacchaeus' story, Joshua was headed to Jerusalem. Joshua has business in Jerusalem. He is going to use his right to defend his sheep and kill the wolf.

Iran seems to be the current main agent for this. Russia and China and a few others should be expected to join in at some point before the end of 2030. Everyone else needs to see and learn from Iran's courage.

Jesus

Common war propaganda against Iran points out that Islam accepts Jesus as a prophet, but Islam does not accept the New Testament crucifixion story. So Zionist propaganda says to support Israel, Pharaoh, instead of Iran.

If you think the "atoning blood of Jesus" is central then you would side against Iran. But, there is the Acts 15 side of this. Joshua was a human sacrifice, to the shame of Zionists. This was by design to gain power over the wolf, so power over the Zionists.

It is possible that Islam's position might be a memory of a Testimony based form of early Christianity. Early believers would not have explained the crucifixion as a sacrifice.

Instead of correcting the matter, that tradition may have had to simply skip the whole subject of the crucifixion of Jesus. Why pick a fight with Zionism when it was not time? In any case, this point of dispute between the major religions may exist because of the New Testament editing by Ananias and how Ishmael's heirs coped with that problem.

We will continue to watch headlines out of Iran. Stopping for the cease fire gave many military commentators the idea Iran had lost. Maybe so. Maybe Iran is different. We need to watch and see. There is good reason to think Iran may be different.

Watch Dates

There are 2 days coming up in the next week that are of interest to us now.

13017-02-27 (2026-04-19) is the last day of the 40 days of rain in Noah. This date is calculated on a rerun of Noah, but 3 years earlier than Noah+7000. This is a likely Noah related prophetic date run postulated from the 3 year civil war after the death of Solomon.

These 40 days have been matched by 40 days of war between Zionists and Iran. The bombing was of the correct number of days for rain, but it landed 2 weeks earlier than we would have expected from the simple chart.

We are currently in a 2 week cease fire, which may explain the early start. So we have credit for 40 days that grants Iran a breather because there is many more weeks to go.

That cease fire is expected to end on Tuesday, April 21, 2026. Zionists cannot keep promises, so we might look for the fighting to resume around our expected date, the Sunday after this blog goes out.

This particular date is important for determining if we are in the 5 months given in Revelation 9:5. If air and missile bombings resume, then this may be an exceptional rerun of Noah where the bombing component goes beyond 40 days.

Remember, Noah in the 1991 Iraq Desert Storm war saw an air war of 40 days, then a ground invasion. Then it was over. That was a normal rerun of Noah.

If bombings against Iran and missiles from Iran resume at around these dates we would expect them to continue for another 150-40=110 days. The terminal date for that would be 13017-07-17 (2026-08-07). It would probably be best if the exceptional Noah was in 2029, but we will see.

There has been many reports of a nearly continuous flow of American assets into the Middle East. This so the USA can fight for Israel and can attempt to take Iran's oil fields. These are generally located on the mainland to the east of Kharg Island. Trump's been speaking about taking Iran's oil. But, he may have other goals.

The pattern of Noah in 1991 really does want a ground war to start this coming week. In the 1991 replay American troops conducted a ground war of 100 hours and were active in Kuwait for about 10 days. At the end of 10 days they began returning home. Ground war intervals and return dates are NOT on the actual timeline of Noah, so this replay of Noah is probably different.

13017-04-02 (2026-04-24) is the prophetic replay of the last year of Asa's reign. This, of course, is calculated within the replay of the life of Joshua when offset by 2000 years. This date is the Friday after this blog goes out. The following day, so Saturday, is the replay of the first year of Jehoshaphat's reign. These king related stories seem to inform a plagues rerun. This seems early for a shift off the plague of Arabs, but we will watch headlines to understand this better.

Note the next plague is of Livestock. This can be financial or else related to transportation or else related to farming. Oil in above ground storage is expected to run out across the world in mid June, 2026. This will be a plague on livestock in the herding and farming senses of livestock.

Shop Work

I am in the shop this week, but mostly working on software related to the audit. More in future weeks.

Headline Review

We are in a war gap because of the 2 week cease fire. As I write this, Trump's side says he has a peace deal with Iran. The Iranian side says no, that war will return. No way to know for sure who's side will be correct. If earlier speculation about a Zionist coup in Iran is correct, then no more war.

We will learn this next week who speaks truth. There has been much discussion about the war so far and how it might develop going forward. We start there.

Nima/Mirandi: Pakistan Talks

The link here is to a Dialog Works interview on Youtube. Prof. Mirandi was at Islamabad for the talks between Iran and Vance. In this interview he gives a few details about what was going on in the room.

There was really no normal delegation on the Zionist side. (Zionists are not agreement capable.) Vance was frequently on the phone and eventually Vance walked out. The Iran side was rightly worried about assassination.

Let me note that in high-value deals there are usually 2 levels of meetings. The technical side deals with the legal matters and details. Executives usually deal with conceptual issues. The Zionists brought no technicians to the talks because they had no intention of making a deal. They did not need the lawyers. They were always going to say no. They were probably looking to kill the Iran side.

Nima/PCR: Fight To Death

This link is to a Dialog Works podcast from this week. Paul Craig Roberts is on with Nima. Paul schools Nima on how this is now a fight to the death. The Iranians should not have agreed to a cease fire. There is no longer any compromise possible because the Zionists want Iran gone. The only question is the schedule and who ultimately wins. Nima does not have enough experience to know how this works. Roberts was caught off guard and could have said more.

Robert Page on Diary Of A Ceo

This podcast discusses the war strategies that are available to both sides in the Iran war. The first 20 minutes or so you can hear in this conversation the war strategy implied by the Revelation 9 passages that deal with the abyss and missiles targeted at Israel. The rest of the podcast is grim. There are no good ways out. The good professor thinks voting can help. This is a religious problem, so voting does not work.

Killing Negotiators

The link here is to a post on X that cites a Washington Post article dealing with death threats to Iranian negotiators. Zionists are not agreement capable. Even if a settlement is agreed, they will never keep their side. Negotiation with Iran is mostly a chance to kill Iranian leadership. The Iranian side is slowly figuring some of this out.

Apologies to the Pope

The link here carries details of the Iranians defending the Pope against Trump. The American public is also mostly on the Pope's side.

Pics of POWs

More evidence that Iran has American POWs already. Ground invasion will create many more. Canon fodder for Zionists. This is a religious war.

Netanyahu Rules

The link here with details of how Pharaoh rules. Note this new version of Netanyahu is much healthier than the man who visited Trump in 2025. I wonder why he now has a young man's eye lashes? Is he wearing mascara?

Weather Radars?

Early Iranian bombing took out American Radars. Seems the storms that I covered in previous blogs may have been because those were weather related radars that were now out of service. Interesting idea. This would be a different cause for rain than taking out cloud seeding flights.

Trump As/Is Antichrist

The link here is to a post on Telegram that shows Trump's AI generated blasphemy of himself as Jesus. It bothered nearly everyone who knows what is going on. Trump may now be the "man of lawlessness" or the "Antichrist." I would reserve those terms for leaders in Israel. But Trump is at least a disciple of those more important figures.

Orban Defeated in Hungary

The link here is to an Alex Christoforou daily news brief. He starts with Orban's defeat in Hungary. Alex covers many of the details. This is the Zionists consolidating power in Europe in order to go to war with Russia here soon.

The open question right now involves the Zionist war fronts in Europe and against Iran. Are these 1 continuous war? Or does Europe wait for later? (Say the 2029 run of Noah but in Europe?)

The Europeans do not have enough weapons for a full on war with Russia. But 3 years from now this may be different. (So on the Noah+7000 timeline.)

Possible Arab at Al-Aqsa

The link here is to a post on Telegram with a short clip of Givr at Al-Aqsa. Getting ready for a temple? Go for it, sir.

International Debanking

Bank accounts are not really money. They are promises of Zionists. Sometimes they break promises. Why should we be surprised?

Fighting Inside Israel?

In the 2008 run of the plagues, the Plague of Arabs was a change in the government leadership. The link here shows some evidence there is a similar fight going on now inside Israel. This may be evidence that plague is now coming to a close.

Ground War Coming

This is a post on X from Daniel Davis. His sources expect a ground war against Iran very soon. Watch this coming week.

More Flights

A post on Telegram with some recent flight stats on arming for ground war with Iran.

Flight Trackers

This link is to a post on X with a composite of the flight tracking radars showing equipment being moved into position for a ground war against Iran. Again, history from 1991 would watch for a ground invasion to begin soon.

Possible Plague Headlines

Swarms of Bees

Israel has been hit with massive swarms of bees. This is what happens when you uproot Olive Trees in the west bank. Those bees no longer have a home, nor food.

This is being called a biblical plague. This does not look like correct timing, but it is a possible plague of gnats and/or flies which we know of as Arabs. Nature's revenge.

Navy Food

This is one of many posts with a photo of food on the USS Abraham Lincoln. The principle in play is you reap what you sow. Sow famine, reap famine.

Tech Links

This war is different than nearly all previous wars in that we live in a connected, high-tech, world. Our devices are part of the Zionist battles.

Lebanon Map

The link here is to a post on X with an Apple Map screen shot showing Southern Lebanon without any towns. US Big Tech is Zionist too. No reason to use this company's products. The other big tech companies are also trouble. Apple looks to be an accomplice to genocide. They are wealthy enough, they should rebuild those now missing towns that they wiped off their map.

Spyware in Phones

The link here is detailing government level bans on Apple phones because of Israel spyware. The same must be going on across the industry, Google will be no better. (Was it the Patriot Act, after 911, that demanded this?)

Computer Security Issues

This link is to a Rob Braxman Tech video on Youtube. Seems AI was used to look for back doors in most operating systems. It found thousands. There are so many back doors that they had to instead order those systems to fix their bugs before they release that back-door finding code.

This begs questions relative to our work. Should recovery be done offline?

The main point for me is that the update cycles for fixing these bugs will make most operating systems unstable for maybe a year. Also note, Braxman does not acknowledge that these back doors are often placed by orders from government. So new back doors must be created when the known back doors are closed. AI might break through those too.

This blog is finally back to more normal blog length.

More Later,

Phil